So you want to design a chamber, there are many ways to do this. My method is not real rigorous, but here it is.

First know what you want. For this example:

- 90% peroxide /kerosene with a solid catalyst.
- 915 lbs max thrust. (This is 125% of max weight for my notional 180 sec vehicle.)
- 320 psi feed pressure (This is our hydro pressure /1.25)
- Optimize for best eff at 475lbs thrust. (This is the mid point on a 180 second burn this number probably needs adjusting upward as more fuel is burned at the beginning of the flight)
- Operate at FAR or Las Cruces, or the new Mexico space port about 4000 ft altitude. (12.4 psi)

Given a 320 PSI feed pressure we need to allocate some pressure drops, I’ll use 75 lbs in the cat pack and 20 percent in the injector /diffuser. I got the 75 PSI from a FMC peroxide catalyst pack design document. I got the 20% from word of mouth and vague references in Sutton.

So the resultant max chamber pressure is (320–75)*0.8 = 260 PSI.

So at our desired optimum 475 lbs we have a chamber pressure of

Cpopt=(475*260)/915 = 134 PSI.

Next Ill run this through cpropep. I ran lots of cpropep runs to arrive at the 0.17g of fuel for 100gm of 90% peroxide. This is the final input file run:

Propellant X/Y

+466 0.90 g

+976 0.10 g

+797 0.17 g

FR

+chamber_pressure 134 psi

+exit_pressure 12.46 psi

The output is:

Thermo data file: thermo.dat

Propellant data file: propellant.dat

Computing case 1

Frozen equilibrium performance evaluation

Propellant composition

Code Name mol Mass (g) Composition

466 HYDROGEN PEROXIDE (100 PC) 0.0265 0.9000 2H 2O

976 WATER 0.0056 0.1000 2H 1O

797 RP-1 0.0121 0.1700 2H 1C

Density : 1.228 g/cm^3

3 different elements

H O C

Total mass: 1.170000 g

Enthalpy : -6420.12 kJ/kg

114 possible gazeous species

3 possible condensed species

CHAMBER THROAT EXIT

Pressure (atm) : 9.663 5.463 0.848

Temperature (K) : 2418.562 2205.550 **1608.636**H (kJ/kg) : -6420.118 -6948.077 -8362.579

U (kJ/kg) : -7389.021 -7831.644 -9007.016

G (kJ/kg) : -36931.242 -34771.963 -28656.161

S (kJ/(kg)(K) : 12.615 12.615 12.615

M (g/mol) : 20.755 20.755 20.755

(dLnV/dLnP)t : -1.00000 -1.00000 -1.00000

(dLnV/dLnT)p : 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000

Cp (kJ/(kg)(K)) : 2.50147 2.45427 2.27083

Cv (kJ/(kg)(K)) : 2.10086 2.05366 1.87022

Cp/Cv : 1.19069 1.19507 1.21421

Gamma : 1.19069 1.19507 1.21421

Vson (m/s) : 1066.56503 1027.58281 875.97064

Ae/At : 1.00000 ** 2.44989**

A/dotm (m/s/atm) : 157.40662 385.62851

C* (m/s) : 1520.94574 1520.94574

Cf : 0.67562 **1.29592**Ivac (m/s) : 1887.43319 2297.97666

Isp (m/s) : 1027.58281 1971.02048

Isp/g (s) : 104.78429

**200.98815**

Molar fractions

CO 9.0878e-002 9.0878e-002 9.0878e-002

CO2 1.2411e-001 1.2411e-001 1.2411e-001

COOH 3.2035e-007 3.2035e-007 3.2035e-007

H 1.6249e-003 1.6249e-003 1.6249e-003

HCO 2.3091e-007 2.3091e-007 2.3091e-007

HO2 1.8081e-007 1.8081e-007 1.8081e-007

H2 8.5414e-002 8.5414e-002 8.5414e-002

HCHO,formaldehy 3.0941e-008 3.0941e-008 3.0941e-008

HCOOH 2.3185e-007 2.3185e-007 2.3185e-007

H2O 6.9535e-001 6.9535e-001 6.9535e-001

H2O2 1.3262e-007 1.3262e-007 1.3262e-007

O 3.1412e-005 3.1412e-005 3.1412e-005

OH 2.4808e-003 2.4808e-003 2.4808e-003

O2 1.0559e-004 1.0559e-004 1.0559e-004

Lots of data here but I really only want the four items I set in bold.

First dimension question how big is the throat?

For 915 lbs thrust at 260 PSI we need the Cf number.

So Throat Area = 915/(260*cf) =2.71 sq inches in area.

The Throat diameter is thus 1.859473 inches.

For thoose who want consistent SI units:

915 lbs is 4080 N 260psi is 179 N per cm^2

So At = 4080/(179*cf) = 17.58 cm^2

converting back to inches for a consistantcy check we have 2.72 sq in.

Now that we have the Area Throat we need Area Exit

Ae=(At*Ae/At) =2.71*2.44989 =6.65 sq in and a diameter of 2.9147 inches.

So now we have the Throat diameter and Exit diameter.

We need the chamber length. This chamber will have Gas/Liquid mixing so we can probably use a shorter chamber than usually, but I’m going to be somewhat pessimistic and use a L* of 50in. I’m also using some fixed catalysts at 7” so my chamber inner diameter is going to be 6.5”.

6.5” diameter is 33 sq in. The At =2.71 so 2.71*50/33 = 4.1 inches.

We now have the major dimensions of the chamber done.

- Throat 1.859 in diameter
- Exit 2.915 in diameter
- Chamber 6.5 in diameter
- Area before the throat 4.1 in long.

The Now to draw some shapes. One could use the classic 15 degree exit cone that would be easy to machine, but gives up a few percent performance. Or one could try and do a parabolic expansion cone. I used the RAO optimum nozzle approximation. This is covered in Rao’s classic paper or texts like Modern Engineering for design of Liquid propellant Rocket Engines (Huzel/Hwang) . This requires that you pick a couple angles off a graph and fit a parabola to the resultant points. The problem is actually over specified so you have to decide which end of the parabola you want to be exact. The cook book formula gives you 4 equations and 3 unknowns. For the more math inclined you have two specified points and the slope at both points and you want to fit a 2^{nd} order parabola through these. Like I said over specified. (You can see the document in question by doing a google book search look at page 76. Search for Huzel Hwang) So after getting some advice and a code snip-it from arocket I wrote a short program that fits a parabola to the defined points . I assumed a 100% of conical length.

So I drew the chamber in the following steps….

- Placed a reference point at 0,0 and one at 0,(1.859/2) (black)
- Drew an Arc of 1.5 rT to 60 degrees (red)
- From the chart Fig 4–16 initial angle is ~20 degrees. So I drew an arc blue of 0.382 Rt to 20 degrees.
- Then I placed a point at the exit position. A 15 degree half angle cone would be 1.97 inches long going from 1.859 to 2.915 inches. So I plot this point referenced from the throat. (Green line)

The result at this point:

Now using my CAD program I read the x,y locations for the end of the blue arc:

Point at (0.239756,0.971775,0). And the end of the green line. Point at (1.97,1.4575,0).

I plug all this into my little program and calculate a script to draw the nozzle. The Program :File Attachment: calcv2.cpp (1 KB). Now I have the basic chamber contour. All I need to do is Add the upper chamber and mirror

Next steps involve giving the chamber some thickness and the design of the catalyst holders and injector/diffuser seals connections etc…. to be continued….

## 6 comments:

I have no knowledge to critic this design but I did want to say thanks for documenting the process.

Very interesting.

Thanks for showing how you do this, I'm in the process of designing my chamber at the moment as well.

The only thing is that, I'm not making a traditional combustion chamber so the same numbers wouldn't quite work for me.

Thank-you very much. I like that you listed the various tools and texts that you used. Is there any particular reason to use a parabola as the nozzle instead of a third order polynomial? I really have no idea but I suppose, with the rate of expansion you get at the throat, that separation is not a problem at that discontinuity in the derivative you have. It just seems to me that smoother would be better.

Is there any particular reason to use a parabola as the nozzle instead of a third order polynomial?

Weak Math ;-)

I can specify 2 end points, the slope at each end and the fact that I want it to be monotonically decreasing slope.

Very nice to read such detailed process rather than just "we made foo". Thanks!

Tangentially, everyone's default is to use JPEG images thinking it is the smallest (including myself) but for technical drawings like this using .PNG would give you way better compression and way better image quality.

20150711wanglili

michael kors handbagsmichael kors outletoakley sunglassescoach outlethollister clothing storeabercrombieabercrombie storecoach outlethollisterlouis vuitton handbagstimberland bootssoccer jerseyscoach factory outletcheap ray banslouis vuitton outletcheap oakley sunglasseskate spade handbagsburberry outletlouis vuittonoakley sunglassesmichael kors outletretro jordansabercrombiecoach factory outletchristian louboutincaoch outletcheap jerseysgucci outlet onlinegucci outletmulberry ukPost a Comment